Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Well, that's what we want as well and if m68k could provide this, what's >> > the reason this couldn't be released as "Debian"? >> >> So far, m68k *can't* provide it. That's the problem. > > Which we are trying to fix, so what if we _could_?
Then m68k would be a suitable release candidate for etch+1. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
