Hi Paul, thanks for your explanations!

On 5/18/19 12:30 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> On Tue, 14 May 2019 10:19:06 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout
> <arnaud.rebill...@collabora.com> wrote:
>> I just had a quick look, so it turns out that:
>>
>> - testing has "golang-golang-x-sys (= 0.0~git20181228.9a3f9b0-1)"
>> - unstable has "golang-golang-x-sys (=0.0~git20190412.9773273-1)"
>>
>> As long as I upload a source package to unstable, it will be built
>> against golang-golang-x-sys from unstable, hence it will be unsuitable
>> for testing.
>>
>> It seems that I should instead upload to *testing-proposed-update**s*,
>> am I correct?
> As docker.io embeds golang-golang-x-sys (am I correct on that), yes.


Yes, docker being written in Golang, it's built statically against its
dependencies.


>
>> Please notice that the version of docker.io in unstable right now
>> (18.09.1+dfsg1-7) has two bug fixes compared to testing:
>>
>> - *#925224*, which was initially the reason to open this unblock bug
>> - *#921600*, which is a bug fix I just uploaded, and I believe should
>> also be part of buster
>>
>> If you agree with this additional bug fix, then what version should I
>> use for the package:
>>
>> - testing-proposed-updates: *18.09.1+dfsg1-7+deb10u1* seems suitable
>> - unstable: should I bump the version as well, so that it's above
>> 18.09.1+dfsg1-7+deb10u1? Something like 18.09.1+dfsg1-7+deb11u1 (+deb11
>> feels strange honestly).
>>
>> Sorry to bother you with these, I'm very new and learning all these
>> procedures.
> A better version would be 18.09.1+dfsg1-7~deb10u1 (your want the same
> version in tpu as in unstable, except with a *smaller* version), then
> you don't need any changes to unstable and the sorting is still correct.

Of course! Somehow it didn't cross my mind, thanks for pointing that out.


> Hi,
>
> On 18-05-2019 07:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> It seems that I should instead upload to *testing-proposed-update**s*,
>>> am I correct?
>> As docker.io embeds golang-golang-x-sys (am I correct on that), yes.
> O, and you want to target *buster* instead of *testing-proposed-update*.


Ok, I've just done that and uploaded the source package. Is there
anything else I should do?


Thanks,

  Arnaud

Reply via email to