On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:01:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:09:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:52:59 +0200 (CEST), Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> said: > > > >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:05:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > >> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:58:25PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > >> > > IIRC, the m68k kernels are already cross-compiled. > > >> > Yes, which has repeatedly caused problems due to assumptions in > > >> > the kernel packaging that host arch == build arch... > > > Can someone point me to these assumptions? > > The last such issue I remember was a result of the kernel building certain > tools using the host (i386) compiler which were needed for building the > remainder of the package, and then shipping those same tools in one of the > (m68k) binary packages for use by add-on module packages. Typical "does not > play well with cross-building" stuff, which may have been resolved already.
Yes, that has been resolved a while ago by the kernel team. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
