On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:46:41PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > I am not a member of the OpenJDK team and contributed far less to the > JDK 8 -> 11 transition than Emmanuel has. If he and Matthias are in > agreement and the plan is palatable to the Release and Security Teams, > that's ideal.
I don't have any preference either, just adding my 2 cents here; with our buster release set to 6th of July and the next Oracle CPU set for July 16, we'll ship a non-GA release of Java for maybe two, at most three weeks (as buster-security will rebase to the next openjdk-11 following the CPU). I'm also fairly sure we've shipped non-GA releases for openjdk-8 before? In any case, whether we go with t-p-u or unblocking the sid version, we should fix a solution before the release and not ship buster with the unfixed issues from the April CPU :-) Cheers, Moritz