Hi, Apologies for missing your mail originally.
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 19:36 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Adam > > Am 16.08.19 um 22:08 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 21:43 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: [...] > > > 241-5+deb10u1 is identical to 241-7 which has been uploaded to > > > unstable/bullseye and we haven't received any regression reports > > > so > > > far. > > > > In that case, feel free to make it -7~deb10u1, with the appropriate > > changelog wrangling, if that would be preferable. > > I considered adding a changelog entry like this as it seemed the most > obvious correct one: > > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +systemd (241-7~deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium > + > + * Rebuild for buster > + > + -- Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> Sat, 17 Aug 2019 11:00:59 > +0200 > + > systemd (241-7) unstable; urgency=medium > > [ Michael Biebl ] [...] > But this then triggers warnings from dpkg-genchanges: > > dpkg-genchanges: warning: the current version (241-7~deb10u1) is > earlier than the previous one (241-7) > > and lintian: > W: systemd: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version [...] > Adam, so I wonder, what's the proper changelog wrangling in this > case? I would say this and ignore the warnings. It looks like you already did that. :-) Regards, Adam