On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 22:41 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On 2/23/19 7:56 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 02:27:04PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in
> > > > > stable-new.
> > > > > Could you reject the existing package first, and I will
> > > > > reupload?
> > > >
> > > > Uploaded a new revision at the request of jcristau.
> > >
> > > Ping?
> >
> > Nevermind, ftpmaster rejected the upload:
> >
> They did not; I did, as I told you in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906258#69
The mail claims to be from "Debian FTP Masters" as it is sent by dak at
the point of rejection. However, in the case of rejections from
{,old}stable-new, dak is simply carrying out requests from the Release
Team.
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 05:47:07PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > > yubico-piv-tool - inappropriate changelog entry
> >
> > Dear ftpmasters, could you clarify in which way the changelog entry
> > is inappropriate, and what would be an appropriate changelog entry?
> >
> An appropriate changelog entry is one that describes the changes made
> to the package. For example, "Remove cruft that was included in the
> source package by mistake" would be one way to describe the changes
> in your upload.
Ping on a new upload? There's just over a week if you want to get this
in to 9.10.
Regards,
Adam
