Hi Fabian, On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:50:53PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> We ask you to take a look at the cyrus-sasl2 package in unstable and > decide if it's fit for etch. If not, we'd appreciate a list of the > blocking issues. If it is fit for inclusion, please advise on what we > need to do, if anything. Just as a side comment, I notice that the package in unstable still includes a -dev package named libsasl2-2-dev. Why? IMHO there's no value whatsoever in renaming the -dev package. I thought we had discussed this and I persuaded you to revert this, but maybe we only talked about the plugin package names? Anyway, that's not a blocking issue by any means; it just makes me a little nervous to hear about maintainers switching to build-depending on this new package name, which is by its nature far less stable than the existing libsasl2-dev name. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]