Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:34:57 +0100 with message-id <a1bcbee1-c512-17d9-7483-d247723a9...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#947676: RM: qt4-x11/4:4.8.7+dfsg-19 has caused the Debian Bug report #947676, regarding RM: qt4-x11/4:4.8.7+dfsg-19 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 947676: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947676 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi! As you know we are doing an effort to remove qt4-x11 from the archive. The next big step is removing it from testing. If my data is accurate the only package holding qt4-x11 in testing is scim, which I have just NMUed. So: - Is there any other blocker I might be missing? - Would it be possible to remove qt4-x11 from testing as soon as the scim NMU enters testing? I think there is no point in waiting for the autoremoval script to take action. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386, arm64, armhf Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=es_AR:es (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Lisandro, Moritz, On 29-12-2019 00:59, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > - Would it be possible to remove qt4-x11 from testing as soon as the scim NMU > enters testing? I think there is no point in waiting for the autoremoval > script to take action. I have added a removal hint. Once there are no reverse dependencies in testing, the package should get removed. Paulsignature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---