On 20/02/2020 06:11, Graham Inggs wrote: > All binNMUs have been scheduled. > There were some packages that seem to have been rebuilt unnecessarily, > but no harm done.
Thanks! > I noticed Ubuntu's ben file is quite different. > Should we update the Debian one to match? > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ruby2.7-add.html > > > title = "add ruby2.7 support"; > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.5/ | .depends ~ /ruby2.7/) & ! > .source ~ > /^(ruby2\.5|ruby-defaults|obexftp|weechat|graphviz|broccoli-ruby|dislocker|geos|kross-interpreters|libprelude|marisa|ngraph-gtk|notmuch|redland-bindings|rubyluabridge|subtle|subversion|treil|uwsgi|vim|vim-command-t|nbdkit|ruby-standalone)$/; > is_good = .depends ~ /libruby2.7/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /libruby2.5/ & ! .depends ~ /libruby2.7/; Yes, we can use the Ubuntu one. It basically excludes the packages that need ruby2.7 as the only default. -- Lucas Kanashiro