Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:34:09AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Indeed, so I think re-adding a libsasl2-gssapi-mit binary package to >> cyrus-sasl2 would be the best option. Is this in progress? > There is already a libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit. Does the > libsasl2-gssapi-mit binary package need to just be a dummy package which > depends upon libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit? Correct. libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit would then also need the relevant Replaces and versioned Conflicts. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
