wf...@niif.hu writes: > We'd be immensely grateful for your input on this matter, since your > position more or less determines how we can plan to support the HA users > in Debian. We'd still prefer a stable update (either to 1.13 as in the > original request or to a more recent stable release), but if that isn't > possible, we'll move forward with backports. (Which isn't a particularly > appealing option in itself, because the imminent libqb 2 transition will > cause much churn across the stack.)
Dear Stable Release Team, Although we've uploaded 1.16-2~bpo10+1 to backports, we'd still be interested in doing a stable update (as above) if possible. Is there anything we can do to that end? -- Thanks, Feri
