Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team, I wish to update armadillo in unstable. A binNMU should suffice for all reverse dependencies. Please let me know your opinion. Thanks. Kumar Ben file: title = "armadillo"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libarmadillo9" | .depends ~ "libarmadillo10"; is_good = .depends ~ "libarmadillo10"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libarmadillo9"; -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_IN.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -- Kumar Appaiah