On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:05:46PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > If so, I would tend towards renaming now, but this must be weighed against > > the possible confusion to users by making available a version of gnujump > > that never existed upstream.
> Well, the upstream source is currently available from the GNUjump download > page at gnu.org (but it's called sdljump). > I've just uploaded the package with the new name, and would like it to be > pushed into Etch. When that happens, sdljump should be removed from it. Well, bug #403424 looks like a problem. :) You'll need to notify us again when this bug is fixed for us to consider it. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
