Your message dated Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:19:36 +0100
with message-id <X/ulibpfnruxr...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#979303: transition: ppp
has caused the Debian Bug report #979303,
regarding transition: ppp
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
979303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi release team folks,

There has been a new upstream release of ppp (2.4.9). I know this is
very soon after my upload of 2.4.8 and its transition, but I'm also both
aware of the transition freeze that's coming up and a large number of
improvements in the new release.

Before I go ahead and update all my packaging, is it likely that we can
get ppp 2.4.9 into bullseye? I dont' wish to over-burden you or push the
boundaries of the freeze, hence the query.

In case this is acceptable:

Ben file:

title = "ppp";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /ppp-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.4\.9-1\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 
2\.4\.9-1\+~\)/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.4\.8-1\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 
2\.4\.8-1\+~\)/;

Many thanks in advance,
Chris

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-01-05 00:19:13 +0000, Chris Boot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi release team folks,
> 
> There has been a new upstream release of ppp (2.4.9). I know this is
> very soon after my upload of 2.4.8 and its transition, but I'm also both
> aware of the transition freeze that's coming up and a large number of
> improvements in the new release.
> 
> Before I go ahead and update all my packaging, is it likely that we can
> get ppp 2.4.9 into bullseye? I dont' wish to over-burden you or push the
> boundaries of the freeze, hence the query.

ppp 2.4.9 and the binNMUs migrated.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to