Hi, On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 05:08:54PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/9/19 2:31 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 14:35 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Since Buster was frozen, I worked quite a long time on Octavia, and > >> was > >> able to make the octavia-agent work properly, as well as building an > >> Octavia base image using Debian only stuff [1]. It works super well > >> using the next version of OpenStack, ie: Stein, while Buster has > >> Rocky. > >> > >> Though I'd like to be able to provide a working Amphorae image using > >> only stuff from Buster, if possible. This is what this update is > >> about. > >> > > > > Please go ahead. > > > > Regards, > > > > Adam > > Hi Adam, > > On top of what you already approved, I'd like to also add what's in this > commit: > > https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/octavia/commit/25eb5debecfc53e3394ca9d5dcf2bc01c563915f > > The reason is, instead of adding so many things when building the > Octavia virtual machine image, it makes a lot of sense to instead push > all of this in the Debian package. At the time of writing the package > for Buster, I had no experience with this, though that's how I am > building the image using Sid these days. > > When we have these in the Octavia package, then building the official > Buster image for Octavia will be super simple, and will integrate easily > in the cloud team's scripts. Hopefully, we can publish such an Octavia > image right after the next Buster point release. > > I've uploaded the above. If you think that's not reasonable changes, > please reject the package and let me know, then we can decide what you > think can go in the Buster package and what shouldn't (though I really > think all of the above is better suited in the package than in the image > build script).
What is the status here? Should the package be rejected and only the original changes included or should be the additional changes accepted as well? Regards, Salvatore