On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 20:16 -0500, Edward Shornock (debian ml) wrote: > It seems that the new upstream changes in glib would qualify as a potentially > "disruptive change".
It has been confirmed that it is genuinely a disruptive change. Bug 404585, severity important, occurs only with the new libglib. It should therefore certainly not be allowed into testing, and hopefully can be backed up. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part