On 2021-11-03 21:23:20, Hugh McMaster wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 10:24, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Why do the binary packages have Breaks + Replaces on binary packages > > with the old SONAME? > > Some files are split from existing packages: > * unixodbc-common takes over some files from odbcinst and odbcinst1debian2. > * libodbcinst2 takes over the (old) library from odbcinst1debian2 > * libodbccr2 takes over the (old) library, which is split from libodbc1 > * libodbc2 takes over the library from libodbc1 > > Note that libodbc1 and odbcinst1debian2 (currently in Sid) contain > symlinks for library version 1 to library version 2, but the existing > packages are named for the old soversion.
What? Why? How did that happen? Are libodbc1 and libodbc2 actually ABI compatible? Cheers > > Breaks+Replaces ensures a smooth transition. > > On a separate note, the asterisk source package now builds and will > migrate to testing on Wednesday evening (UTC). It just needs a rebuild > during the unixodbc migration. > -- Sebastian Ramacher