On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:46 PM Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org>
wrote:

> On 2021-11-08 23:03:51, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 = confirmed
> >
> > On 2021-11-08 22:41:02 +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> > > Hi Sebastian:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Sebastian Ramacher <
> sramac...@debian.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why is liburdfom-tools  being renamed? This packages does not
> contain a
> > > > shared library.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > No reason. Good catch. I've uploaded 3.0.0+ds-3 that revert the
> > > liburdfdom-tools name change.
> > >
> > > Run ratt again with this new version:
> > > https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/debian-ratt-builder/126/
> > >
> > > 2021/11/08 17:25:15 PASSED: ros-collada-urdf
> > > 2021/11/08 17:25:15 PASSED: ros-kdl-parser
> > > 2021/11/08 17:25:15 PASSED: ros-urdf
>
> They all failed with:
>

Holy moly, the ratt build is using the 3.0.0 version and did not fail.
https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/debian-ratt-builder/126/artifact/logs/buildlogs/ros-urdf_1.13.2-7/*view*/
I don't know why, I need to look deeper into the problem. Sorry for that
Sebastian.


> CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/urdf/urdfConfig.cmake:171
> (message):
>   Project 'rviz' tried to find library
>   '$<$<NOT:$<CONFIG:Debug>>:-lurdfdom_sensor'.  The library is neither ja
>   target nor built/installed properly.  Did you compile project 'urdf'? Did
>   you find_package() it before the subdirectory containing its code is
>   included?
>
> This looks like a bug in urdfcom to me … three <, but only two >.
>

It is, indeed. Jochen sent the patch upstream
https://github.com/ros/urdfdom/pull/164 and I have uploaded 3.0.0+ds-5
shipping it. Let's see if that fixes all the problems.


>
> Cheers
>
>
> >
> > Please go ahead
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you please proceed with the transition?
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sebastian Ramacher
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Ramacher
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Ramacher
>

Reply via email to