Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:56:39 +0100
with message-id <yzvshyzofuomu...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#998067: transition: libsepol and libsemanage
has caused the Debian Bug report #998067,
regarding transition: libsepol and libsemanage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
998067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
libsepol and libsemanage have both bumped their soname from 1 to 2, the
packages already went through the NEW queue and are in experimental.
The transition trackers are already created:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsepol.html
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsemanage.html
Most of the packages are from the same upstream.
For libsemanage, sssd and shadow will have to adjust their build-dependencies
For libsepol, dmraid must remove the build-dependency, this is useless,
see #929484. Note that dmraid already has a RC bug, for other reasons.
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-11-07 17:45:08 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirmed
>
> On 2021-11-05 11:19:04 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 22:29:41 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > >
> > > On 2021-10-29 13:44:16 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: transition
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > libsepol and libsemanage have both bumped their soname from 1 to 2, the
> > > > packages already went through the NEW queue and are in experimental.
> > > >
> > > > The transition trackers are already created:
> > > >
> > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsepol.html
> > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsemanage.html
> > > >
> > > > Most of the packages are from the same upstream.
> > > >
> > > > For libsemanage, sssd and shadow will have to adjust their
> > build-dependencies
> > >
> > > Have bugs been filed for that?
> > >
> >
> > I just did that now, see #998633 and #998634
> >
> > Note that I uploaded a new revision (3.1-2) of libsemanage in unstable to
> > ease the dependency between the library package and the -common one and
> > allow co-installation between libsemanage1 and libsemanage2.
> >
> > Maybe we should wait until 3.1-2 has migrated to testing (and maybe reduce
> > the migration time so we are not waiting 5 days?)
>
> -2 migrated, please go ahead.
The old packages got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
