Am 03.12.2021 um 15:21 schrieb Julien Cristau:
Control: tag -1 moreinfoHi Michael, On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 01:58:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:I'd like to make a stable upload for udisks2, fixing #992152: "udisks2: please update Recommends on exfat-utils to exfatprogs for Linux kernel 5" This issue has already been fixed in unstable/testing and the relevant changes for bullseye are an upstream cherry-pick and a packaging cherry-pick.How compatible are exfat-utils/exfatprogs? E.g. could this cause unexpected results (outside of udisks) for a user system that switched to exfatprogs as a result of this?
The command line tools are (mostly) compatible. I'm only aware of the issue detailed at https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/882 i.e. exfat-utils provides a mkextfatfs tool, whereas exfatprogs doesn'tIt is my understanding that exfatprogs is the vastly superior implementation and we should prefer it over the FUSE based one.
I've CCed Sven, as exfatprogs maintainer, for his input. Regards, Michael
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature