Hi, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote on 08/09/2022 at 13:00:11+0200:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 9C5C99EB05BD750A created at > 2022-09-08T13:00:11+0200 using RSA]] > Hi all, > > On 01-09-2022 14:18, Paul Gevers wrote: >> Of course there are details to figure out and agree on, but before >> diving into those I'd like to hear if you are open to support the >> idea (hopefully even in time for bookworm) or if there are already >> deep concerns (that would take long to resolve if at all). > > Although I wasn't expecting a big wave of enthousiasme from this > audience, I was expecting at least some reply with concerns. Given > that there hasn't been any reply, I don't know how you feel about > this. > > To be able to proceed before the bookworm freeze, I'm going to assume > that in general this split (that shouldn't really impact DSA and > ftp-master work [1]) is acceptable by you if there's no reply in two > weeks. I'll work out more details after that. > > Paul > > [1] I predict it may even reduce the amount of architecture specific > removal requests in unstable, where the porters have a chance to fix > broken packages. Would tier II be exclusively composed of builders that are currently supported by DSA? Cheers! -- PEB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
