On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:01:47PM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 14:47 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:36:50AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> > Hi Steve, >> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 12:15:57AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >[...] >> > > * What's the preferred way to go for Bullseye, given we're just >> > > about >> > > to do another point release? Should I go down the security >> > > path or >> > > just upload straight to bullseye and go via s-p-u? >> > >> > I think for this one (and give the timeframe for the point >> > release), a >> > stable-proposed-updates is more appropriate. I agree, the >> > functional >> > regression is caused by the security fix, but to me it looks enough >> > that we can go here the point release path (unless a SRM now >> > strongly >> > disagrees). The window is closing this weekend for the uploads. >> >> ACK. I'll give Adam a short while to chime in... > >I was going to say I'd defer to the security team when I read the >initial mail, so... either way works for me, as long as it happens >soonish.
ACK, I'll go ahead with the stable-proposed-updates upload now then. Cheers! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.