Hi, With only my random DD and d-i hats, leaving the release one aside…
Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> (2023-05-24): > I am requesting to override the priority of adduser to become > required. Watching from the sideline, this seems to come in horribly late. > apt used to depend on adduser and apt is required, so adduser is > transitively required in bullseye. Johannes and myself worked towards > making apt not depend on adduser and that work succeeded. FSVO “success” then, given the rest of the mail… > We've now fixed such postrm scripts to no longer do that, but we agreed > with the release team that it should be difficult to remove for bookworm > in order to make purging packages left over from bullseye just work > after and upgrade to bookworm. Originally, the idea was to add back the > dependency from apt. Out of curiosity, why wasn't that easy fix implemented? > Instead, we made apt "Protected: yes". Via olasd/#debian-release: adduser got that field, not apt. > This still doesn't install it by default, but makes removal difficult > which is what saves postrm purge scripts, so all should be good. > Except that this makes piuparts unhappy as it tries to remove adduser > and apt being unhappy about it. This is presently breaking testing > migration for a number of packages. So now we thought about it again > and got to the conclusion that adduser should also be Priority: > required for bookworm (and unstable until bookworm is released). Same question as before, why not just add the dependency back? > Doing so is a late change, I know. However, it gets us back to the > bullseye state and in being required, debootstrap --variant=minbase > will install adduser again, which will fix piuparts. So an we do that? Aren't we risking a redux of “we turned another knob, and now we're discovering yet another issue”? I'm not particularly worried about people using d-i to install minbase specifically, and even with the open questions above, I wouldn't normally object to the proposed change from a d-i perspective. But I'm very much worried about possible side effects at this critical stage of the freeze. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
