On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:03:39AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi Adrian,
Hi Adam, > While checking the status of the linux upload to proposed-updates this > morning, I noticed that the packages for mipsel and mips64el were still > in the BD-Uninstallable state, whereas those for some other > architectures had already started building. > > Further investigation showed that you requested a give-back for the > package on those architectures while they were in Needs-Build. Could > you please explain why you did so? >... to avoid building on a buildd where it would take until Monday, like one of you did in a different way afterwards when killing the mips64el build on mipsel-aql-02. The next fast buildds mipsel-osuosl-04 and mipsel-osuosl-05 were still busy for an hour in unstable,[1] I would have given back when they would have been certain to be the next available buildds. > Regards, > > Adam cu Adrian [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/recent.php?pkg=&a=mipsel%2Cmips64el