Hi Tatsuki, On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:27:07PM +0900, Tatsuki Sugiura wrote: > >>> In Message "Re: I ask to put libapache2-mod-fcgid into etch" > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >>> Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said; > > >> I'd like to put libapache2-mod-fcgid into etch certainly. > > >> Actually I do't resolve libapache2-mod-fcgid bugs yet. > > > > > >> But previous version 1.10-1.1 works properly. 1.10-1 has no bugs > > >> over 3 monthes, and NMUed -1.1 for apache2.2 dependencies. > > > > > >> Can I ask to put libapache2-mod-fcgid 1.10-1.1 into etch? > > >> Or, do I need surely to fix current version to contain the > > >> package into etch?
> > > Since 1.10-1.1 is no longer in the archive, if you want it to be included > > > in > > > etch, it will need to go through unstable again with an epoch. > > > Or you can figure out how to fix 2.0 and ask that version to be considered > > > instead. > > Thanks both. > > At first, I'll upload again previous version with epoch to include > > libapache2-mod-fcgid into etch surely. > Sorry for late. > I made new package that was rewinded to 1.10. > Would you unblock libapache2-mod-fcgid? > And, can I upload 1:1.10-2 now to unstable? (I donot upload yet.) Yes, I would accept this as a fix for the package. > # After that, do I need to add "sid" tag to RC bug related this? You should mark the RC bug as closed in package version 1:1.10-2 since that version is not affected by the bug. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]