On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Adrian
Hi Sebastian, > On 2023-10-20 08:30:21 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2023-10-19 18:00:29 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > > > > Do you need help from us? > > > > > > Can you please schedule the necessary binNMUs for the new GHC? We have a > > > list here [3] that is updated every 4 hours. We are currently blocked > > > until this happens, as we need all existing packages to build with the > > > new GHC. > > > > Scheduled. > > I see that you failed plenty of the haskell binNMUs. Would you mind > reporting the corresponding bugs so that the maintainers are aware of > what to fix? TIA the maintainers are already aware that every new major version of ghc needs a source upload of > 1k packages to make the libghc-*-doc packages installable again so that the new ghc can migrate to testing (this was point 3 in the email from Ilias). I've failed binNMU'ed packages that did not yet have a source upload for 9.4 since they will anyway need an upload, and then their rdeps would need binNMUs again. IMHO > 100 RC bugs for these packages would not be helpful right now, it will be easier to report remaining issues (if any) from excuses when the maintainers have finished upgrading/uploading all packages. > Cheers cu Adrian
