Your message dated Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:54:02 +0200
with message-id <ab562719-4110-4132-af55-956b36938...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1071235: transition: qt6-base 6.6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071235,
regarding transition: qt6-base 6.6.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1071235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi Release Team,

we would like to request a transition for Qt 6 from 6.4.2 to 6.6.2.

To prepare for this transition, we tried to build as many reverse
dependencies as possible. We encountered some FTBFS, but those failures have
either been fixed since or patches are available to make the packages
build with Qt 6.6.

As part of this transition, we also reverted the name changes from the
time_t transition for all libraries in qt6-base except the core library
which will keep the t64-suffix (libqt6core6t64).
We think this is ok since every Qt library depends on libqt6core6t64 and
hence depending on libqt6core6t64 signals t64-compatibility.

The Ben file for the transition is attached.


Thank you.


--
Patrick Franz
title = "Qt 6.6.2";

is_affected = .depends ~ 
/\b(libqt6concurrent6|libqt6dbus6|libqt6gui6|libqt6network6|libqt6opengl6|libqt6openglwidgets6|libqt6printsupport6|libqt6sql6|libqt6test6|libqt6widgets6|libqt6xml6|libqt6concurrent6t64|libqt6dbus6t64|libqt6gui6t64|libqt6network6t64|libqt6opengl6t64|libqt6openglwidgets6t64|libqt6printsupport6t64|libqt6sql6t64|libqt6test6t64|libqt6widgets6t64|libqt6xml6t64|qt6-.*-abi
 \(= 6\.4\.2\)|qt6-.*-private-abi \(= 6\.6\.2\))\b/;

is_good = .depends ~ 
/\b(libqt6concurrent6|libqt6dbus6|libqt6gui6|libqt6network6|libqt6opengl6|libqt6openglwidgets6|libqt6printsupport6|libqt6sql6|libqt6test6|libqt6widgets6|libqt6xml6|qt6-.*-private-abi
 \(= 6\.6\.2\))\b/;

is_bad = .depends ~ 
/\b(libqt6concurrent6t64|libqt6dbus6t64|libqt6gui6t64|libqt6network6t64|libqt6opengl6t64|libqt6openglwidgets6t64|libqt6printsupport6t64|libqt6sql6t64|libqt6test6t64|libqt6widgets6t64|libqt6xml6t64|qt6-.*-abi
 \(= 6\.4\.2\))\b/;

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13/06/2024 09:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 06/06/2024 21:40, Patrick Franz wrote:
Hej,

Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024, 09:49:59 CEST schrieb Emilio Pozuelo
Monfort:
[...]
Sounds like we're in good shape. You can go ahead.

All Qt packages have been uploaded, so you can start with the binNUMs
soon.

The kuserfeedback s390x build issue is blocking this. Can you take a look at it? From a quick look it looks like the renderer vendor is empty, which could be a regression in mesa.

Thanks for uploading kuserfeedback. I had to remove a couple of packages that were blocked on texlive-bin, and Qt6 has migrated to testing.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to