On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >> I would love to see an upload to unstable before you start with that > > >> work, so that we can get a releasable version of iceweasel into > > >> testing soon. If time allows, you can propose a new packages with > > >> reorganized/added patches at a later point, but right now, I would like > > >> to get big pieces like iceweasel finally ready for release. > > > I'll try to roll a new release tonight.
> > This led to #413162 (and friends). Could you please do another upload > > fixing only this bug, so that we finally have a version that is > > releasable? > Plus, upstream is going to put up a 2.0.0.3 release fixing regressions > introduced in 2.0.0.1 and 2.0.0.2, including a fix on client certificate > handling that may be important at least for french people who want to do > their tax declaration online using iceweasel. We really need to be converging on the release at this point. If 2.0.0.3 doesn't include any RC fixes, please upload the 2.0.0.2 that you have so that we can get iceweasel into a releasable state and consider 2.0.0.3 when it's available. I recognize that bending the freeze guidelines is somewhat unavoidable due to Mozilla upstream's practice of delivering security fixes in a lump sum, but that doesn't mean I'm content to bend those guidelines for other bugs that aren't RC at all. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
