Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2025-04-24 08:20:50 +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 07:29:27AM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 2:13 AM, Peter Green wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> If preferred, a variant of the proposed changes with a default of "no" 
> > >> would
> > >> also be possible
> > >
> > > I think the default (for bin packages) should be not to generate a 
> > > multi-arch:
> > > field at all.
> > >
> > > This is behaviorally equivalent to multi-arch: no, but it IMO has 
> > > different
> > > implications, it implies "noone has thought about multi-arch for this 
> > > package"
> > > rather than "sometime has thought about multi-arch for this package and
> > > rejected it"
> > 
> > Thanks for the quick feedback!
> > 
> > Helmut Grohne raised a similar objection on IRC, and like I noted in unblock
> > request, that works just as well. Having "no" as default is easiest, having
> > no default (which like you say, is "behaviorally equivalent") means a bit
> > more code changes, but can be supported as well.
> 
> debdiff for the "set no value by default" variant attached, rationale
> remains identical to initial report.

Please go ahead with the version no value per default.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Reply via email to