On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:48:06AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:18:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Sam Hocevar wrote: > > > > Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet > > > > clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable for 5 months and > > > > also fixes a potential security issue.
> > > Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore. > > More concretely, this package has a substantial diff, a build is missing on > > sparc, and the request for unblock didn't originate with the maintainer... > Okay, would a t-p-u upload of the current 2.2.1 package with the > alternative activated and the security fix be acceptable? Also, there > should be a sparc build, I don't know where it's stuck, but it should > not be a problem. Yeah, that should be ok, but getting t-p-u/non-free builds poses an additional challenge. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
