On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 07:11:22AM -0400, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Le samedi 27 septembre 2025 à 09:31 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > > * Sébastien Villemot <[email protected]> [2025-09-23 12:30]: > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > > User: [email protected] > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > > > Please schedule a transition for the latest major upstream version of > > > Octave, > > > version 10. All the arch:any Octave addons need to be rebuild. > > > > > > Octave 10 has already been uploaded to experimental. > > > > > > A rebuild of all the packages affected by the transition has been > > > performed. > > > Bugs were filed, see: > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=octave-10;[email protected] > > > > > > All issues but one have fixes ready or even applied. For octave-stk, no > > > solution is ready yet, so it will have to temporarily go out of testing. > > > > > > We stand ready to upload and NMU as needed if other issues arise. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > title = "octave-10"; > > > is_affected = .depends ~ "octave-abi-59" | .depends ~ "octave-abi-60"; > > > is_good = .depends ~ "octave-abi-60"; > > > is_bad = .depends ~ "octave-abi-59"; > > > > Thanks for this work, Sébastien. > > > > It seems that the transition is finished [*], besides the known issue > > with octave-stk. > > > > Is it time to request the biNMUs? > > The binNMU have precisely been performed by the Release Team. This is > why the table is all green, except for octave-stk. > > Besides octave-stk, it seems that there is problem with octave- > statistics autopkgtests, see: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/octave
And a piuparts problem: ∙ ∙ Rejected due to piuparts regression - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/o/octave.html 0m19.3s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot: /usr/share/octave/site/api-v60/octave_packages cu Adrian
