Your message dated Thu, 22 Jan 2026 12:24:13 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1126144: unblock: mozjs140/140.6.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1126144,
regarding unblock: mozjs140/140.6.0-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1126144: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1126144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:mozjs140 src:gjs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 at 10:02:43 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
Could you please add a hint so that gjs 1.86.0-3.1 and mozjs140
140.6.0-1.1 migrate to Testing sooner? The GCS binNMUs broke
gnome-shell on arm64. Because of the nature of binNMUs, this not only
caused gnome-shell on Unstable to be broken, but Testing too almost
immediately.
The tracking bug for the gjs/mozjs140 issue is https://bugs.debian.org/1125777
Converting this into a bug report so that it doesn't get lost.
gjs seems to be ready to migrate "naturally", but mozjs140 could benefit
from some age-days so that it fixes the regression sooner for arm64
users running forky.
Thanks,
smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 1/22/26 12:14, Simon McVittie wrote:
gjs seems to be ready to migrate "naturally", but mozjs140 could benefit
from some age-days so that it fixes the regression sooner for arm64
users running forky.
Right. Sorry for the delay.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
