On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > asterisk builds with binutils/forky. > > ld segfaults with binutils/sid even when using -Wl,--discard-sframe. > > Debian is currently following the upstream master branch of binutils, > based on the above I would suspect a binutils regression unrelated > to sframe. > > Backtrace: > #0 0x0000555555572260 in ldelf_after_open (elfsize=64, prefix=0x5555555aa226 > "/usr", is_freebsd=0, is_linux=1, native=1, > use_libpath=1) at ../../ld/ldelf.c:1333 > #1 0x0000555555594805 in ldemul_after_open () at ../../ld/ldemul.c:80 > #2 lang_process () at ../../ld/ldlang.c:8563 > #3 0x000055555559a401 in main (argc=31, argv=<optimized out>) at > ../../ld/ldmain.c:958 > > This is likely: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33780
Thanks a lot for the info. I've reported the ld segfault issue as #1126397, but Matthias disputes that the bug is RC and still tags the bug as "moreinfo". As a bug reporter, I think I already did everything I could do and therefore do not find such request reasonable. Release Managers: Could you please look at the bug and adjust the severity if appropriate? With available data, I believe we should not allow this binutils version in testing. Thanks.
