Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2026 22:53:58 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1126892: transition: urdfdom
has caused the Debian Bug report #1126892,
regarding transition: urdfdom
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1126892: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1126892
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:urdfdom
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear release team:
As the maintainer of the urdfdom I think that we are good to start the
transition from 4.x to 5.x which is in experimental.
Dependencies needs to be rebuild accordingly.
Ben file:
title = "urdfdom";
is_affected = .depends ~
/\b(liburdfdom\-model5\.0|liburdfdom\-sensor5\.0|liburdfdom\-world5\.0|liburdfdom\-model\-state4\.0|liburdfdom\-model4\.0|liburdfdom\-sensor4\.0|liburdfdom\-world4\.0)\b/;
is_good = .depends ~
/\b(liburdfdom\-model5\.0|liburdfdom\-sensor5\.0|liburdfdom\-world5\.0)\b/;
is_bad = .depends ~
/\b(liburdfdom\-model\-state4\.0|liburdfdom\-model4\.0|liburdfdom\-sensor4\.0|liburdfdom\-world4\.0)\b/;
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2026-02-20 19:12:30 +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> Both urdfdom and urdfdom_headers are now in testing.
And the old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
