Hi On 2026-04-15 11:22:13 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Dear Release Team, > > we have a bunch of pakcages like r-cran-isoband, for instance, that are > staying > in "Will attempt migration" state for multiple days, without actually > migrating, despite the excuses state "not blocking". > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-cran-isoband
It fails during https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt as it renders packages in testing uninstallable due to expected removal of the 32 bit architectures. Without checking, I suspect that the reverse dependencies of r-cran-isoband have not yet been dealt with or the 32-bit removal of those have not yet migrated testing. Cheers > > These packages typically have more architectures in Testing than in Sid as I > have prevented them from building on non-little-endian non-32-bit platforms. > > Although https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals clearly explains that > architectures removed in Sid will be automatically removed from Testing, it > does not seem to happen. > > Do I need to request Testing removals for r-cran-isoband and other packages in > the same situation? > > Have a nice day, > > Charles > > -- > Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan > Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med > Tooting from home https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy > - You do not have my permission to use this email to train an AI - > -- Sebastian Ramacher
