On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 08:30:06PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Keith, > > On 4/15/26 04:30, Keith Packard wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], > > [email protected] > > Control: affects -1 + src:binutils-arm-none-eabi > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: rm > > > > I've merged two embedded binutils binary packages > > (binutils-arm-none-eabi, binutils-riscv64-unknown-elf) into a single > > source package (binutils-embedded) and added a third > > (binutils-aarch64-none-elf). > > > > I had assumed that removing this package from unstable would eventually > > cause it to be removed from testing; in case that isn't true, this bug > > is a request to explicitly remove it from testing. > > > To try and speed things up, I already have some hints [1] in place from > 2026-02-26, 2026-03-15 and 2026-03-19, but migration+removal > "binutils-embedded,-binutils-arm-none-eabi,-binutils-riscv64-unknown-elf,gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf" > is blocked [2] because it would make several package unbuildable or > not-installable in testing: > src:altos, gcc-arm-none-eabi, src:hackrf, src:libnxt, > libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-dev, src:libstdc++-arm-none-eabi, > libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-newlib, libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-picolibc, > src:newlib, src:nxt-firmware, src:pico-sdk, pico-sdk-source, > picolibc-arm-none-eabi, src:picolibc, src:picotool, src:sunxi-tools > > I just checked and I can't spot any piece that is not fixed in unstable, so > I guess britney2 just got too confused by the src:binutils-embedded taking > over the binaries and what it all implied. I'll extend my hint with the > packages that have different versions between unstable and testing in the > set above and hope that that will help.
The newlib support removal (see #1127739) is not fixed in pico-sdk-source. > Paul >... cu Adrian
