Hi Holger On 2026-10-04 14:44:02 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi all, > > today we got another "autoremoval of blendsel" mail (quoted below). > > In this case, both underlying RC bugs are already done, so nothing will > happen effectively this time, but a deeper view shows, that these bugs were > already closed several days ago (23./25. Sept. 2026). > > So, it seems that the mechanism for generating these autoremoval mails is > working on base of outdated data?
It is not. At least #1148561 still affects testing and the state of the bugs in testing counts for autoremovals. Cheers > > This is of course not optimal, it wastes people's time for no reason... > > Maybe this script needs some love? > > > Regards > Holger > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Forwarded message: > > Am 4. Oktober 2026 06:39:12 MESZ schrieb Debian testing autoremoval watch > <[email protected]>: > >blendsel 0.12 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-10-25 > > > >It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > >1146296: django-oauth-toolkit: FTBFS: E AttributeError > > https://bugs.debian.org/1146296 > >1148561: python-anyio: CVE-2026-64847 CVE-2026-63349 CVE-2026-63374 > > https://bugs.debian.org/1148561 > > > > > > > >For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent > >autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval > > > >This mail is generated by: > >https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl > > > >Autoremoval data is generated by: > >https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl > > > > -- > Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3 > -- Sebastian Ramacher
