Your message dated Tue, 10 Nov 2026 21:23:25 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1151274: transition: renaissance
has caused the Debian Bug report #1151274,
regarding transition: renaissance
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1151274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1151274
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:renaissance
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
I would like to have a slot for a renaissance transition
(librenaissance0 -> librenaissance0d).
I noticed that EOModelEditor from bin:gnustep-dl2 is broken as its UI
description files rely on tags implemented only in the unreleased
Renaissance version. To rectify that, we packaged Git master and
unfortunately I had to introduce a Debian-specific SONAME. Most of
the changes are API additions but a few methods were renamed which is
an ABI break.
The last upstream release was 18 years ago and the dedicated upstream
maintainer retired, so I don't expect a future release any time soon.
The sole reverse-dependency gnustep-dl2 builds fine against the new
library version so it can be binNMUed.
Additionally, if we are allowed to have this new version in forky, I'd
like to switch fisicalab.app to use it (it supports both the "classic"
fixed-size UI with .gorm files and the dynamic autolayout provided by
Renaissance with its XML-based .gsmarkup files).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2026-10-20 11:28:49 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 19/10/2026 14:54, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> > Control: affects -1 + src:renaissance
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > I would like to have a slot for a renaissance transition
> > (librenaissance0 -> librenaissance0d).
> >
> > I noticed that EOModelEditor from bin:gnustep-dl2 is broken as its UI
> > description files rely on tags implemented only in the unreleased
> > Renaissance version. To rectify that, we packaged Git master and
> > unfortunately I had to introduce a Debian-specific SONAME. Most of
> > the changes are API additions but a few methods were renamed which is
> > an ABI break.
> >
> > The last upstream release was 18 years ago and the dedicated upstream
> > maintainer retired, so I don't expect a future release any time soon.
> >
> > The sole reverse-dependency gnustep-dl2 builds fine against the new
> > library version so it can be binNMUed.
>
> Go ahead.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
