On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, September 11, 2007 10:29, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > > I suppose this will have to be uploaded to stable-proposed-uploads as > > well, but what version number? etch and sid have the same upstream > > version, so how do we avoid collisions? > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but what's wrong with the usual > appending of "etch1" to the existing version number, i.e. 1.1-3etch1?
1.1 means the old upstream tarball, but that's not possible because the tarball has to change. There's fixed tarball, 1.1.dfsg. We could pick that, but then what debian version? -0.1etch1 is already higher than the sid one. Sounds like -0etch1 would work, but how correct is that? -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
