Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 23:49 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 04.03.2008, 00:02 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:15:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2? The previous > > > > one had a broken clilibs control file, resulting in bugs like #468906 > > > > (builds against new version won't work with old version). > > > > > gnome-sharp2 2.16.1-1 > > > > How do I know by looking at the packages which architectures need binNMUed > > > and which don't? > > > If the packages have dependencies on libglib2.0-cil (>= 2.10.1) or > > libgtk2.0-cil (>= 2.10.1) they need a binNMU. Those dependencies should > > all be >= 2.10.4 > > It looks like gnome-sharp2 depended on (>= 2.10.2), not (>= 2.10.1); does it > still need binNMUed?
Yes, I meant 2.10.2, sorry. > And the packages that depend on libglib2.0-cil (>= 2.10.2) have arch: all > packages built from the same source which have the same dependency - do > those packages also need to be rebuilt? If so, these packages need > sourceful uploads, not binNMUs. Ok, then I'll do a sourceful upload instead. Just curious, but why are binNMUs of arch: all packages not possible? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]