* Frans Pop [Sun, 18 May 2008 17:38:52 +0200]: > Given that, maybe even removal would be an option, but I'll leave that to > RMs.
The removal will happen eventually, since it's been removed from unstable already. But not before libaws is rebuilt against libldap-2.4-2, which FTBFSed, and needs somebody investigating it. > I think that libldap2 may just need its priority reduced. For those reading along at home, Ganneff did this on IRC. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Mecano - No es serio este cementerio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]