On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:17:49PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I agree that enough buildd power would be a good thing, but that do > not mean the ordering should not be tuned. Packages will a lot of > reverse dependencies, and at least packages with reverse dependencies > the buildd queue, should be built before their reverse dependencies.
This is mostly done by ordering the sections. For instance libs has the highest priority, and is followed by debian-installer, base (which doesn't exist anymore?) and devel. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
