On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 02:29:44PM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > unifont/1:5.1.20080808-1 unblocked. > > > Robert Millan just informed me via Bug #494473 (Severity: Important) > that the latest version of GRUB depends on the file > > /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex > > being present.
No no, not the latest. It's the other way around! The dependency on this file is stablished since 2007, right after I added it to unifont in an NMU. The version currently in testing provides unifont.hex, but 1:5.1.20080808-1 does not. If 1:5.1.20080808 migrates before unifont.hex is included, it will cause breakage in existing grub2 packages in Lenny in case they are recompiled. > Can a "-2" version of "unifont" be uploaded that contains that file? > If so, what should the timeframe be? Would it be best to fix GRUB > quickly, or best to wait a few days and see if anything else is > reported? If unifont.hex is added back for -2, I have no objection in using it for Lenny. But please let me know when it is uploaded so I can test it. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
