On 8/16/08, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dude, the guidelines say "changes for release goals, if they're not > invasive", not "not invasive changes, for $whatever they are".
I still haven't heard in what way this change constitutes something invasive. It's a simple two-liner and its consequences are safe. > I'm pretty much done with this discussion; 2.10.1 continues to be ok for > lenny if you drop that change. See above. -- Martin-Éric Racine http://q-funk.iki.fi
