On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:20:22PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > OK. I refined now my analysis by checking build-dependencies of > source packages in testing against the binary packages in testing+sid. > (for a start), and I removed packages for debian-installer (Lucas > told me hat the d-i team does not care about recompilation issues for > these) and packages excluded by Packages-arch-specific. Furthermore, > I partionend the result into three sets:
Please check if the unstable package already dropped the build-deps in question and mark it resolved in that version then. > linux-modules-extra-2.6 (= 2.6.25-5): FAILED > binary: iscsitarget-modules-2.6-amd64 > The following constraints cannot be satisfied: > linux-modules-extra-2.6 (= 2.6.25-5) build-depends on r6040-source {NOT > AVAILABLE} Dependency dropped and I thought about requestion removal of the package (r6040-source) if it would have been in testing. > partconf (= 1.26): FAILED > The following constraints cannot be satisfied: > partconf (= 1.26) build-depends on libparted1.7-dev (>= 1.7.1-1) {NOT > AVAILABLE} D-I, fixed in unstable. > partman-base (= 120): FAILED > The following constraints cannot be satisfied: > partman-base (= 120) build-depends on libparted1.7-dev (>= 1.7.1-1) {NOT > AVAILABLE} D-I, fixed in unstable. Bastian -- The man on tops walks a lonely street; the "chain" of command is often a noose.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature