Hi Adeodato, On Tuesday 11 November 2008 18:42, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thijs Kinkhorst [Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:53:14 +0100]: > > Hi, > > Hello, > > > Please allow mailman/1:2.1.11-5 to fix a release critical bug. Adeodato > > already unblocked -4 for this bug, but another upload was necessary to > > handle a special case in the init script. Changelog below. > > > > mailman (1:2.1.11-5) unstable; urgency=high > > > > * Make init script also cope with non-specified site list. > > > > -- Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:26:46 +0100 > > I reviewed -5 the other day already, and had some concerns. Good thing > you wrote. Though I now see some of them are not a regression.
> Anyway, only the `set -e` bit is important, please upload to fix at > least that one. I am not sure if that actually was a problem, because I tested it and it worked, at least in my environment. Still, I think your suggestions do improve the detection code so I've included them. Besides that I now also mention the detected site list name in the warning we output when the list is not found. Can you please review and approve mailman/1:2.1.11-6? thanks, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]