On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:30, Bastian Venthur <vent...@debian.org> wrote: > Adeodato Simó schrieb: > >> No, my question was not about dropping rng, but whether you’re planning >> on using the newly-available python-reportbug API to avoid code >> duplication, and to work with the reportbug maintainers to make said API >> meet your needs as an alternative-to-reportbug implementation author. > > I would have to have a look at it since I currently don't know what > python-reportbug actually provides. If it covers a lot of rng's needs I > will probably use this instead of my own implementation if it's > possible.
It includes the core logic of reportbug, while 'reportbug' package contains the executables, along with the documentation. > I'm sure reportbug could also benefit a lot from my code since > rng uses SOAP for ages instead of HTML parsing. We are still planning this move (and will be done for sure), but it's not that easy as "switch a flip". Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
