On 20 December 2009 at 17:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote: | Hi, | | Sorry for the delayed response. | | On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 07:17 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 15 December 2009 at 19:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote: | > | libquantlib-0.9.7 has been removed from unstable. However,rquantlib is | > | still not built on several architectures (it's waiting for r-base, which | > | is waiting for fontconfig to be built / uploaded everywhere) and | > | quantlib-swig again FTBFS with a compiler error when it was retried on | > | amd64. | > | > For different packages, and on several occassions, I have had to resort to | > removing -O2 / -O3 for certain arch/compiler combinations. Do you recommend | > a new upload of quantlib-swig with special treatment for amd64 ? | | That would be one solution. As earlier versions of quantlib-swig have | previously built successfully on amd64, it would be good to work with | the porters and/or buildd-admins to try and resolve the ICE and have the | package build without resorting to building an unoptimised package.
I had only lukewarm response from others on similar issues -- doko basically recommends 'file upstream bugs' and from those I never heard back either. Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
