[ -release readers: the original, including the diff, can be found at http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2010/06/msg00001.html ]
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 12:48 +0000, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I could have uploaded 1:3.2.1-11 to sid just it won't go into testing > due to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584545 and even > if that would be fixed we'd wait behind gcc-defaults which waits for > gcc-4.4 which waits for eglibc. And OOo 3.2.1 also has important fixes, > so I decided to upload that to sid directly. [...] > openoffice.org (1:3.2.0-11) unstable; urgency=high > > * debian/patches/extensions-mozilla-plugin-pc-if-libxul.diff: remove > again .. > * debian/patches/fix-bashisms-in-configure.diff: in favour of the > correct fix (== vs. = breaking with dash) > * debian/patches/avoid-execution-of-python-macros-when-browsing.diff: > avoid execution of python code when browsing macros (CVE-2010-0395) > > * debian/rules: > - fix variable to not add kfreebsd-i386 to OOO_MONO_ARCHS twice but > to actually add it to OOO_MOZILLA_ARCHS > > -- Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> Mon, 31 May 2010 22:50:07 +0200 > > (I of course will fix the .changes to contain testing or testing-security) Overall, I don't see a problem with fixing this via t-p-u, if that's the route you'd prefer to take. Looking through the diff, I did spot a couple of things that weren't directly mentioned in the changelog - one of the packages has had a duplicated architecture name removed from its arch list and the build-dependencies have been modified which clutters the diff a little; after some reformatting, it appears that the latter change is basically: -xulrunner-dev [i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 alpha amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 armel hppa ia64 ppc64 s390x sparc] -libnss3-dev (>= 3.12.3) [i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 alpha amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 armel hppa ia64 ppc64 s390x sparc] +xulrunner-dev [i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 kfreebsd-i386 alpha amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 armel hppa ia64 ppc64 s390x sparc] +libnss3-dev (>= 3.12.3) [i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 kfreebsd-i386 alpha amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 armel hppa ia64 ppc64 s390x sparc] dmake (>= 1:4.11) -mono-devel (>= 2.4.2.3) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64 kfreebsd-i386] -libmono-dev (>= 2.4.2.3) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64 kfreebsd-i386] -mono-utils (>= 2.4.2.3) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64 kfreebsd-i386] -cli-common-dev (>= 0.5.7) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64 kfreebsd-i386] +mono-devel (>= 2.4.2.3) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64] +libmono-dev (>= 2.4.2.3) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64] +mono-utils (>= 2.4.2.3) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64] +cli-common-dev (>= 0.5.7) [i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 ia64] I'm assuming that's related to: > * debian/rules: > - fix variable to not add kfreebsd-i386 to OOO_MONO_ARCHS twice but > to actually add it to OOO_MOZILLA_ARCHS ? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1275855479.5737.234.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net