2010/8/23, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: > On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:50, Arthur Loiret wrote: >> 2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: >>>> This package still needs a bit of work, but not on this >>>> side. >>> >>> Ah, I'd assumed everything was basically ready to go and just waiting to >>> be uploaded. How much is "a bit of work"? One issue I did notice is >>> that llvm-defaults is missing a build-dependency on m4 (having tried >>> building it in a clean(ish) chroot). >> >> The source package was given "in its current state", so not ready to >> be uploaded yet. The "bit of work" remaining is quite small (partly >> done locally already). I will probably give you the finished version >> later today. > > Any news on this? How far off are you from having a final version of > llvm-defaults and llvm-2.6 ready? (I'm assuming/hoping that the latter > would largely be a copy of the current llvm source package with the > necessary symlinks added, rather than also including a new upstream > version).
Here is llvm-defaults: http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm/llvm-defaults_0.1.dsc It should be close to its final state, but note its libllvm-ocaml-dev package is not installable yet because I need to do an llvm-2.7 upload before. llvm-runtime, llvm and llvm-dev are fine. llvm-gcc-4.2 is now fixed. llvm-2.6 is on its way, and will be quite simple: no source changes from the llvm package, just a few packaging bits. Thanks, Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=ojedus+rj0jpaq=qcdaeu=75q4bkei0mt=...@mail.gmail.com
